POST NO BILLS 1881
nan turpin photographs
Post POST NO BILLS 2012
This week Primary Source had intended to give herself a treat and, in the absence of real Paris, tour some 2012 snapshots of the place. Our world is off its axis, however, as we are beginning to suspect, and even the modest pleasure of a simple “stay-cation” is quickly compromised by current events. French and European demonstrations, pro-Palestinian or pro-Peace, have been held the past few days.
According to a July 22 New York Times article, most of the demonstrations have been non-violent. Over the week-end riots, fights with French police, vandalism of businesses characterized as “Jewish” (especially in the Paris suburb of Sarcelles) and “smoke bombs” thrown around synagogues have taken what many French intended as political discours into the nasty realm of flagrantly, inescapably anti-Semitic acts.
The French government’s immediate ban on more Gaza demonstrations instantly turned into a free-speech controversy as political organizations and parties to the right and left complained. The French government then quickly issued permits for demonstrations this week-end.
The French nation, its people of all political persuasions, and the French state, currently presided over by a socialist, are caught in a problem that’s over 60 years old, the seemingly intractable Palestinian/Israeli violence. Whatever its origins, the poverty and violence of the place are a fact. Other political interest groups in other parts of the region and the world including Europe will use Gaza for their own internal contexts, if and when it suits them. What happens locally, whether in Paris or Berlin or Amsterdam, has very local reasons for happening. That is where the analysts should look.
The French nation and French state carry the weight of over 200 years of French history of their relations with Jews. French Jews and Jews seeking asylum from other parts of the world, found France of the 1789 Revolution a place where citizenship, the highest form of hospitality, was theirs for the reasonable price of the civic contract: come here, stay here, but be French. What a French citizen believed or practiced (for example religion) was entirely their own business. But in all that concerned the community of citizens there was an endorsed culture.
That civic nationality, not based on ethnicity, gave France a durable luster in the world Jewish community that was dimmed by the “black years” of Nazi Occupation/Collaboration, when some French citizens helped or tried to help escaping or hiding Jews but others, notably French administrations like the Vichy government and Paris Police, cooperated with the Nazis for their own reasons.
Part of the post-WWII history for the French, people and state, has been acknowledging that part of their history and then making or trying to make a new bond with the French Jewish community. This has been a difficult, emotional, wrenching few decades on all sides and it is one that a great many French, gentile and Jewish and secular, have put their hearts into.
French nation and state also live in the awareness of nearly two centuries of history with the Arabs (now called Muslims) who were their colonial subjects in North Africa and also, after World War I, in the Levant. Since approximately the 1960s, they have related to these populations in a post-colonial context and seen a number of immigration waves, some solicited, some endured, as French speaking Muslims familiar with French culture, found a place, made a place in France for themselves and their children, then grandchildren and now great-grandchildren.
Post-Algerian War anti-Arab racism was virulent in some quarters in France, and with it the kind of pejorative racist slurs that Americans from the same period were all too familiar with in the United States. Those were harsh years, during and after the Algerian War, late ’50s-early ’60s.
Since then the French live with the burden of that war and of the racism that followed in France. The point being here that for periods of crime and cruelty in the culture, committed by the very few to be sure, the culture as a whole feels the need to atone and that process seems to proceed at the slow pace of one generation after another maturing and aging into the next generational bloom.
We do it in the United States for our own terrible reasons. We understand it or we should when we witness it in another country. So that brings us to last week-end’s French riots. The riots seem to have been very few (compared to the number of demonstrations around the country) and small scale (compared to the perhaps 10’s of thousands who stepped into the street to march).
But as it stands, we are all at the ready to judge the French nation and French state for the crimes of a very few. If the government and political organizations are not managing to make this all better right away, it’s complicated.
Those 200 years of history suggested above just make things harder. When we attempt to assess contexts and actions right now, are we not in our bones mindful of what has gone before? We see what is happening in our now through a great historic blur of rights and wrongs.
Should we declare a World Day of Weeping for the murky ways our past obscures our present. Or is this is the only way to live a human life and the only way to return to the humane when we momentarily leave it behind? In our pasts we have done some things wrong but many things right. We might begin to say it out loud, when contemplation of the past enters into our attempt to muddle through the present. That would be a start.